tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11034229.post428498157856350089..comments2023-07-14T02:53:40.719-07:00Comments on retired doc's thoughts: Has the third party medical payers' dream come true,physicians as medical resource stewards practicing parsimonious care working for the common goodjames gaultehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05537303135780186926noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11034229.post-1227713840952200662014-05-20T08:35:36.186-07:002014-05-20T08:35:36.186-07:00Perhaps you missed the most important part. "...Perhaps you missed the most important part. "Medical Ethics," in the bourgeois sense, is ONE PERSON applying reason to a situation concerning the care of ANOTHER PERSON.<br />Both of these are redolent with individualism. Rather, perhaps the SOCIETY should make rules for what a prior SOCIAL REASONING <b>will be applied to a citizen in every case.</b> Therefore, workers can participate without the onus of "ethical decisionmaking," but simply following orders.<br /><i>This is tommyrot, and has killed millions in the process of proving empirically that it is nonsense.</i> Evidence-based sociology says you can walk for miles on the bodies of the dead without touching the ground - ask Mao.<br />But yet, we will try and try again. We don't have enough of a "population-based healthcare" mind to avoid using techniques that result in genocide. That's not our department.Troglodytum Brachiandumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03916873097306876414noreply@blogger.com