Featured Post

Is the new professionalism and ACP's new ethics really just about following guidelines?

The Charter ( Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium.A Physician's Charter) did not deal with just the important relationship of ...

Friday, January 18, 2019

"Some people do not deserve health care reform?what would Maimonides have said?

The notion of someone "not deserving medical care reform" has appeared at least twice in writings by physicians. KevinMD taked about it here as he called attention to a commentary by Dr Edwin Leap. Dr.Leap is a long time medical blogger and ER physician and submitted this essay to an online version of a newspaper.

My first cursory reading of the essay and KevinMD's comments I erroneously read it to say " "Do some people not deserve medical care"


Sometime ago I wrote about a wonderful essay by Dr. Lawrence J. Hergoff published in JAMA which seems to address this line of thought.


Near the end of his current manuscript he quotes part of the Oath of Maimonides:

"May I never see in the patients anything but a fellow creature in pain."
I added:

Not as someone who deserves his dyspnea because of cigarette use defying years of advice to quit, not as someone whose ascites is his just due from profligate use of alcohol, not as someone who should not be in this country at all, not as someone who would not be having the myocardial infarction at all if he had done what his doctors told him to do and not as someone who is taking "scarce medical resources" from someone who deserves them more or for whom the treatment could be more cost effective but as a fellow human whose is in need of what physicians spent so many years of their lives preparing themselves to be able to offer.

The oath ( Maimonides) should remind us that being face to face with a fellow human in need

..makes judgment beyond the biomedical not only unnecessary but inappropriate.


Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Comments on the "Extreme Exercise Hypothesis"

Dr. THM Eijsvogels  from the Netherlands has written extensively the relationship between endurance exercise levels and various cardiovascular outcomes and findings.

His  recent (1) review with an annotated references list  is available in full text on line.

Maybe the first question should be "what do you  mean "extreme'?

U.S. National and WHO guidelines  recommend 250 minutes of moderate exercise per week or 125 minutes of vigorous ( greater than 7 METS) per week based on in part a well established  reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity as well as numerous other health benefits. However ,US guidelines also state that exercise above that levels is associated with added benefits. But how far "above" should one go. Can you go too far?

Is there a U-shaped curve when you plot health risk of the Y axis and exercise training volume on the x axis? If so, can the inflection point be defined?

Arem (2015) combined data from six prospective population based cohorts ( 661,137 individuals).Maximal all-cause mortality risk reduction was noted at exercise level of 3-5 times current recommendations and even  those exercising at 10 times current recommendation had a lower mortality risk  ( HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.78). But at the highest level the degree of risk reduction was . less than that achieved by lower exercise levels,

Ten times would be 25 hours ( one full day) of moderate exercise per week,I suggest very few exercise at that level while many preparing for a marathon would likely exercise 7 or 8 hours a week (3-5 the recommend levels).The relatively few exercisers at the highest volume make the confidence intervals for HR estimation at that exercise level so large as to not be reliable or useful.

Eijsvogels summarizes the quest for "what do mean by extreme" with this understatement:

" Based on limited current evidence and numerous potential confounders, it is difficult to delineate an upper limit for the for the benefits of physical activity at this time."

So there is no epidemiologic support for a U shaped relationship between exercise volume and health risk at least as measuring all-cause mortality. But what about certain medical conditions that have been reported to be increased in long time endurance athletes at levels said to be higher than those who exercise less.

The usual suspects include 1) atrial fibrillation 2)cardiac fibrosis 3)coronary artery calcifications.

I have commented on atrial fibrillation before ( see here) and will likely have more to say later and have blogged about the coronary  calcification paradox before( see here).

Cardiac or myocardial fibrosis (MF) is detected by cardiac MRI imaging with injection of gadolinium referred to as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE).There is a recognized pattern of LGE designating the fibrosis following a heart attack. The  LGE pattern at issue in endurance athletes is something different.

Van de Schoor et al did a systematic Pub Med search (2) and identified 65 athletes with MR. A subgroup (30 subjects) were identified in an MRI study of 509 athletes.

The most frequent pattern was that located near the interventricular septum  and right ventricular insertion points. The significance of this type of myocardial fibrosis is unclear.

Levine (3) et al have suggested that LGE in endurance athletes may not represent irreversible fibrosis and note that a similar pattern of LGE at the insertion points is sen in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension.

Chan et al (4) described the histopathology in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In a multi institutional study of 1293 HCM 10% demonstrated small areas of LGE in the area of  ventricular insertion into the ventricular septum. Biopsies showed " greatly expanded extracellular space" with intestinal fibrosis and disorganized myocyte patterns." The authors emphasized the pattern was not that of myocyte death and replacement fibrosis.

Perhaps a similar histologic pattern would be found in the endurance athletes but to my knowledge that information is not available.

LGE has been reported in participants in various sports , the first case was a soccer player. Its significance and underlying mechanism  ( repetitive microtrauma, transient pulmonary artery pressure over load ??) are  not known.

 I have to agree with Eijsvogels' summary statement :  )"There is limited evidence that supports the "extreme exercise hypothesis",the most compelling relating to the increased risk of atrial fibrillation at high volume of exercise. 2) cardiac abnormalities may be present in a small proportion of the most active veteran athletes …"






1)Eijsvogels, TMH, er al The "Extreme Exercise Hypothesis:Recent findings and cardiovascular
health Implications. C"urr Teat Options Cardio Med 2018 20:84

2)Van de Schoor, F ,et all Myocardial Fibrosis in athletes . Mayo Clin Proc 2016,2016

3)Abdullah, Sm Lifelong Physical Activity regardless of does is not associated with myocardial
fibrosis. Circ Cardiovas Imaging. 2016 9,:e005511 (ful text)

4)Chan R, et al Significance of late gadolinium enhancement at right ventricular attachment to ventricular septum in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J cardiol. 2015:116 436

Monday, January 07, 2019

The concept of medical commons is a bogus and dangerous concept

A fundamental concept of the various types of egalitarianism is. neither coherent,correct and operationally meaningful. .. That concept is : Individually possessed  resources or assets should be considered as part of a collective pool owned by everyone and that all have an equal right to some share of the pool.

In regard to a private property system the rights of the owner in general terms are clear. The owner has the right to use his property,exclude others from us of the property and dispose of the property through sale,gift or inheritance.

 In contrast , the rights are in a common ownership system are vague and indeterminate. Feser said it is not clear how one can be said to "own" something if no one in principle is excluded from making a claim on that something.

Even a  cursory survey of the twentieth century reveals how tragic and unsuccessful were attempts to build a society based on the notion of common ownership and the abolition of private property. The Bolshevik revolution promised peace,freedom ,equality and prosperity and delivered mass murder and starvation.Communist China's attempt in that regard were no better .The dramatic nighttime photograph of the Korean peninsula showing darkness in the north and countless points of light in the south tells the story of the difference between the two systems of ownership..

Yet the movement to consider medical or health care resources as a central pool or a medical commons has had surprisingly wide acceptance in certain medical organizations and medical academia and among health care planners and policy wonks.

Even though the concept of a collective pool of individually possessed resources is basically void of meaningful operational content a derivative metaphor-that of the physician as a steward of the mythical medical resources-has been promulgated and to some a surprising degree accepted and has become part of a major  and growing effort to control medical care and has become part of the discourse about health care policy.

The rules by which a collective of healthcare resources  would be allocated are not defined, but  those who advocate the physician as steward of these resources have several things in mind to make the metaphor operationally meaningful, the most important of which is the purported ethical requirement of physicians to adhere to guidelines which in their most at least superficially justifiable  analytical form are based on a cost benefit analysis and in their least evidence based form , expert opinion.

Cost effective analysis has been smuggled into the professionalism package in the trojan horse of social justice. This is bogus as well.he The utilitarian mantra of the greatest good for the greatest number is not necessarily a part of the concept of social justice.The basis of social justice is equal respect for all humans while utilitarians would favor policies that benefit the aggregate though some individual may loose. The prominent egalitarian John Rawls rejected utilitarian allocations because they ignored the separateness of individuals and in his mythical behind- the- veil contract he believed that individuals would not sign up for a society that would sacrifice them for some aggregate benefit.









High value? Fuzzy concept? who gets to decide?

"Some measures are golden, but mostly those that we have tested. We have a responsibility as a profession to challenge this concept without seeing clear evidence that patients benefit from labeling some measures as value. Value and quality are fuzzy concepts. How can one oppose using value and quality? No one opposes the concept, but we all should demand that the implementation of measures does improve patient outcomes. We should all worry." From a blog commentary by Dr. Robert Centor. Yes, we should all worry.

Value and quality have been buzz words- buzz to be blended into "value statements" and purported goals . 

Classical economists ' notion of value as something imparted into a good by the labor expended in its production was overturned by economists in the late 1800s when Menger and others introduced the idea of  marginal subjective value. The value of a good or service was subjective,that is in the eye of the beholder, and was made "at the margin".The value of the tenth piece of apple pie is less to a person than is the value of the first piece. Great effort and artistic skill might be expended in the production of an artistically beautiful pogo stick but labeling it a high value product would not  bring about large sales of such a product. Few potential consumers would value such a product.

Marx 's labor theory of value is  resurrected in the payment system  for medicare "The doc fix" carried that archaic misconception  further. The Medicare payment scheme contains elements likely to be admired by the old time Soviet Union central planners".

Third party payers embrace the notion of high value medical care . The words quality and high value are  loose, vague and indeterminate  but seem to have considerable rhetorical value . They are found to a degree making them worthless in myriads of value and missions statements of various organizations whose actual activities and goals have nothing to do with those statements.
Some measures are golden, but mostly those that we have tested. We have a responsibility as a profession to challenge this concept without seeing clear evidence that patients benefit from labeling some measures as value. Value and quality are fuzzy concepts. How can one oppose using value and quality? No one opposes the concept, but we all should demand that the implementation of measures does improve patient outcomes. We should all worry.
- See more at: http://www.medrants.com/archives/8118#comments
Some measures are golden, but mostly those that we have tested. We have a responsibility as a profession to challenge this concept without seeing clear evidence that patients benefit from labeling some measures as value. Value and quality are fuzzy concepts. How can one oppose using value and quality? No one opposes the concept, but we all should demand that the implementation of measures does improve patient outcomes. We should all worry.
- See more at: http://www.medrants.com/archives/8118#comments
Some measures are golden, but mostly those that we have tested. We have a responsibility as a profession to challenge this concept without seeing clear evidence that patients benefit from labeling some measures as value. Value and quality are fuzzy concepts. How can one oppose using value and quality? No one opposes the concept, but we all should demand that the implementation of measures does improve patient outcomes. We should all worry.
- See more at: http://www.medrants.com/archives/8118#comments

Thursday, January 03, 2019

What happens to your heart in you train really hard for a year or two may depend on your age

First -what happened to the hearts of young men and women who trained intensively for one year in preparation for a marathon.See below for changes noted in older subjects.

Dr.Benjamin Levine (1) and colleagues at the Institute for Exercise and the Environment performed extensive physiologic studies on 12 such  subjects ( aged 29 +/- 6 years) and provided valuable insight into the functional and structural change in their hearts over  one year.

The training program was intensive and progressive and was divided into four 3 months periods or segments. The third quarter included 2 hour long runs and 4 th quarter involved 7 -9 hours per week  with 3 hour long runs and interval training.

The cardiovascular system of the trained endurance athlete differs in a number of ways from the untrained person.These include:
1.increased red blood cell mass and blood volume
2.increased numbers of mitochondria and capillaries in leg muscles.
3.lower peripheral arterial resistance
4.lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure during exercise.

What distinguishes the elite endurance athlete's heart from other equally well trained athletes is the very large stroke volume which in turn depend on a very large end diastolic left ventricular volume (LVEDV). A  very compliant left ventricle is the key.

The maximal 0xygen uptake increased from 40.3 =/-1.6 to 48.7  =/-2.5. (The 02 max for elite marathoners is typically 70 to 80 plus).  Maximal stroke volume increased from 98 to 113 ml.

A key finding was that both right and left ventricular mass increased to levels similar to those seen in elite athletes but the LV volume did not change until six months of training. In the first 6 months of training when training did not include significant high intensity training the left ventricle remodeling was concentric and eccentric remodeling ( i.e. increased LV volume) did not occur more intense exercise was part of the regimen.The right ventricle began "eccentric" hypertrophy early on. Question -is the eccentric pattern dependent on the addition of some HIT or interval training in addition to the moderate intensity exercise.

Cardiac catherization data derived measures of LV compliance improved but did not approach those typically observed in elite athletes. The "Starling Curves" which plot pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) which is an index of left ventricular filling pressure on the x axis versus stroke volume on the y axis shifted up and to the left suggesting an improvement in left ventricular compliance, i.e a ventricle more easily filled.


Their morphology measurement which  were done by cardiac MR ( generally thought to be more accurate than echocardiographic measurements) did not conform with the Morganroth hypothesis (1975) which stated that endurance exercise lead to eccentric hypertrophy which is a balanced increase in wall thickenss and ventricular volume while strength training leads to concentric hypertrophy with an increase in wall thickness with no significant change in cavity size.

Levine's subjects first had a LV concentric pattern and only after more intense ( volume and intensity) exercise was part of the program did the classic endurance athletes eccentric pattern become evident. A certain level of  intensity of exercise seems to be necessary for aerobic exercise to cause eccentric hypertrophy. This seems to run contrary to the notion  that endurance exercise is simply a "volume overload event".

Levine's group has also reported on a similar project (2) involving older ( age 68-74) subjects and although their training program was vigorous it was less intense than the young subjects.The 02 max increased on average by 19%,arterial elastance decreased, LV mass increased with no change in the mass volume ratio ( i.e physiologic remodeling) but the Staring curves did not indicate a more compliant left ventricle.So good things happened but improved LV compliance was not one of them.

The third publication (3) in Levine's hat trick involves similar measurements of  heart function and structure in middle age subjects over  a two year period.The details are complex and interested readers can find details in ref 3 which has  entire text without firewall.

The two year training program involved at least 30 minute session of moderate exercise 4-5 times  per week with at least one high intensity exercise session ( the Norwegian 4x4).
The authors were able to show an improvement in compliance using the techniques ( The Starling curves) mentioned above .The data offer the hope that "middle age" is not too late to start .

Levine suggests that sedentary aging effect of the heart has 3 stages; 1) loss of relaxation 2)loss of compliance or stiffening of the myocardium and 3) remodeling.This sedentary aging may predispose  to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) perhaps when confronted  by another "hit" such as hypertension,obesity,and diabetes. Levine's data suggests that some doable amount of endurance exercise might retard or mitigate the process . (Whether high intensity exercise is a necessary component is still an open question)







1) Arbab-Zadeh, A  "cardiac remodeling in  response to 1 year of intensive endurance training.
Circulation 2014, 130 (24) 2152

2)Fujimoto,N Cardiovascular effects of 1 year of progressive and vigorous exercise training in previously sedentary individuals older than 65 years of age. Circ. 2010, 122 (18), 1797

3) Howden EJ et al Reversing the cardiac effects of sedentary aging.A randomized trial.Circulation,2018 137; (full text available on line without firewall)

Monday, December 31, 2018

Left Bundle Branch block cardiomyopathy-incidence

 Altered cardiac function has been recognized in Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) as early as 1989 (1).

 In 2005,Blanc et al  (2)described five patients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose cardiac function was "normalized" by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) suggesting that longstanding LBBB could cause a cardiomyopathy that was potentially reversible by CRT.Prior to Blanc's paper animal studies had demonstrated that LBBB could cause progressive cardiac structural and  functional loss that could be to some degree reversible with CRT.Blanc suggested that his paper introduced "a new concept of left ventricular dyssynchrony-induced cardiomyopathy"

In 2013 Vaillant (4) et al published data that tended to confirm Blanc's thesis.
.

The topic of concern here is so called isolated LBBB  as a cause of cardiomyopathy. i.e LBBB not associated with ischemic heart disease or other recognized causes of a cardiomyopathy , LBBB as a cause of a dyssynchronopathy.

HV Barot et al (3) from Lahey clinic  identified patients with LBBB ,without evidence of coronary artery disease or other recognized  cause of cardiomyopathy  and an LVEF greater than 45% and followed them for 40 +/- 24 months. Of a total of 94 patients meeting the entry criteria, 13 developed  a  significant decrease in EF to 31+/-7 % .

All lone LBBB instances are not created equal.The degree of dyssynchrony and the patterns of altered depolarizations vary as does the resultant degree of loss of LV function and the likelihood and rate  of progression of a cardiomyopathy.

From a clinical point of view several questions are important. What factors indicate that a aymptomatic patient with LBBB will develop heart failure? What should the clinical managment be when a patient with LBBB develops a significant decrease in ejection fraction?

The experience reported by Wang et al (5)  strongly suggests that the usual heart failure package of medications is not very effective in LBBB induced heart failure.At what point should CRT ( either BI-V or His Bundle pacing) be considered ?



1) Grines,CL et al Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block.The effect of interventricular  asynchrony.Circulation 1989:79, 845

2) Blanc,JJ et al Evaluation of left bundle branch block as a reversible cause of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with serve heart failure. A new concept of left ventricular dyssynchroncy-induced cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2005,7 604-610

3)Barot, HV Incidence of Left bundle branch block-associated cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiac Failure August 2017, vol 23, issue 8, supplement, p S55

4) Vaillant, C. et al Resolution of left bndle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy by cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll. Cardiol. 2013:61, 1089


5)Wang,NC et al New onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and time from diagnosis to cardiac resynchronization therapy. The NEOLITH II study PACE 2018 Jan 4

Friday, December 21, 2018

Variably unreliable information form Pacemaker technicians

 In the first three  years of of having a pacemaker (PM) implanted the following instances of misinformation,lack of proper oversight or misdiagnosis occurred.

1)In October 2015 I had a pacemaker implanted- one  which is designed for bi-ventricular pacing  the most common form of CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy).

 2)The technician who assisted and provided technical advice to the EP cardiologist at the time of the implantation told me on the following day that my home ,bedside PM communication device  would send a recording every night to the manufacturer's web site  and then to the hospital PM center.

Only 6 months later was I informed by him , in reply to a question from me, that no -that was not true and that arrangement was only for devices with a defibrillator  which I did not have.  So for six months I made a effort for  me to be near  near by communication device device each night.

2.In October of 2016 my device recorded several episodes designed as AF/AT  (atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia) Episodes of AF are thought to be common  ( at least 30% by three years in patients with a PM- according to one data base)This lead to to my fairly extensive literature review of the issue of AHRE ( atria high rate episode). I learned that the topic is controversial and opinion varies as to what if any threshold there is for "signficiant volume of AF" to justify anticoagulation. (There are 2 randomized clinical trials underway that are designed to try and answer that question)

Also All AHREs so designated by the PM's algorithms are  not in fact AF. The phenomenon of far field r wave sensing and  and a less common and more obscure PM rhythm disturbance known as   non reentrant ventricular atrial synchrony(RNRVAS)  are capable of mimicking AF.The technician at the hospital PM center  who is tasked with screening the remote interrogation report had not recognized that the rhythm was FFA and apparently did not feel that the issue required calling the matter to the attention of the EP cardiologist.

I send an email to my EP cardiologist  and I was  told  the issue of short episodes of possible AF are very controversial and I  did not need to come any sooner or consider taking anticoagulants. He apparently did not address the possible issue of FFS or RNRVAS).

 However three months later, at routine office followup a  technician noticed that the earlier interrogation did not actually show AF but rather FFS  the reoccurrence of which he intended to prevent  by increasing the sensitivity threshold on the atrial lead. The EP cardiologist  agreed, and I later leaned that FFS is not an uncommon cause of AHREs particularly so in the type of lead placement that I have. (Placement in the Bundle of Hi which in my case is higher up in the ventricle than the standard apical placement of the RC lead)


3)At an August 2018 in office PM interrogation, the technician and I entered into a conversation about battery life estimation  and she wondered if the estimate of battery life was disproportionately shorter than what may have  been expected on the basis of the settings .She forwarded the data to the home office and the engineers found nothing to do to improve the settings.Her concern and interest was appreciated but ..

In talking to her I quoted the section of  the device manual in regard to the device powering down a bit with several settings once three months has passed after the recommended replacement time ( RRT date). She said no that was not the case with my particular model However, I contacted the pacemaker company  technical support and they confirmed the manual's description was correct. 

4)Issue of high left ventricular (LV)  threshold occurring on multiple of the every three month reports.It was not until October 2017 (2 years after implantation ) that the left ventricular management system was switched to "monitor". I can only speculate as to the degree to which battery life was shortened by  what seems to be the less than prompt attention to that issue. 

The interrogation report is fairly long and reviewing it requires considerable technical knowledge about  cardiology,PMs in general as well as certain details regarding the specific brand and model and various lead placement configurations .Being a retired physician I have had the time and interest to spend a fairly large amount of time and effort into learning about PM lore and in particular the interrogation reports. The somewhat  shaken confidence in the folks monitoring the wires in my heart has certainly provided incentive to learn how  to read the reports. 







Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Cardiovascular function and muscle studies on "lifelong" exercisers

Gries et al from Ball State Human Performance Lab have published the results of a study of cardiovascular  function and muscle enzyme levels on long term aerobic exercisers who did aerobic exercise for fifty (50 !) years and compared them to non exercisers of comparable age and to young exercisers.

The life time exercisers were divided into 2 groups based on the intensity of lifelong exercise  with the "performance" group consisting on competitive runners and the others called the "fitness" group which I take to mean they exercised to be fit and were not competitive athletes.Both subgroups of the
lifelong exercisers exercised 5 days per week with an impressive 7 hours of exercise per week.

The maximal oxygen consumptions values were , (expressed as ml/kilo/min):

performance group 38.1 +/-1
fitness group  27.1 +/- 2
young exercisers 53 +/- 3

Not surprising that the competitive group would have a significantly higher 02 max.In regard to muscle enzyme levels there were no differences between the competitive and fitness groups and levels were similar to the values seen in the young group.

Similar values for 02 max in  longterm exercisers were reported  (1) by Benjamin Levine's group from Southwestern. They also reported a significant higher 02 max in the competitive subgroup versus the non-competitive subgroup ( 39.5+/- 5.3 versus 32.5+/-5)

These two studies present data on two subgroups of long time or "lifelong" exercisers with the competitive groups having significantly higher maximal oxygen uptakes. Both subgroups exercised for many hours a week but presumably the competitive group in each study exercised at a higher intensity. Is the difference in measured maximal oxygen uptake due to the intensity of training or is the difference due to the competitive group having the enviable genetic endowments that  bestows a super compliant left ventricle capable of rapidly  filling and allowing a higher exercise stroke volume.

1) Bhella PS , Impact of lifelong exercise "dose"on left ventricular compliance and distensibility
JACC vol 64 2014