Plato envisioned a utopian society ruled by philosopher kings,leaders with ideas. Brilliant and knowledgeable, logical and devoted to the good of the crowd.  Even back then the question was raised, "who will guard the guardians?" or "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
The platonic ideal has persisted through the years since Plato pontificated.Currently those whose world view echos Plato are called progressives or [modern day]liberals as opposed to the classical liberals who hold the opposite view.Also, from what I've read the neo-conservative  Leo Straus was a bit enamored with some of Plato views on government.
A apparent modern Plato fan is H.J.Aaron who  has had three commentaries in the Perspective sections of the  NEJM in the last year. He seems to be their go-to guy for his Platonic mindset and particular for  IPAB issues.Here is a link to  a sample of his views. 
He  praises Congress for their willingness to "abstain from meddling in  matters they are poorly equipped to handle." ( Well, that would be a first)  He seems to be aware of  Public Choice theory (he has a PhD in Economics from Harvard) when he  talks about the temptation of Congress to spend money for political ends  but seems to have missed the point when he apparently assumes that the  IPAB panelists would be immune to lobbying efforts.Clearly, he believes  it is a good and desirable thing for Congress to delegate its powers to  agencies and other bodies- a view somewhat in opposition  to what James  Madison envisioned but a major feature of the administrative state. 
He  likens the creation of IPAB to the creation of the Fed Reserve which was  to be an entity not subject to congressional control set up a  governmental entities largely not controlled by Congress.
IPAB is not much in the news currently as the legislative trigger for its activation has not been pulled  but be aware it is still on the books and is available to be the mechanism by which selfless, wise leaders will direct health care miraculously immune to pressure from  lobbyists representing interests that Madison referred to as factions. 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment